Impact of Home Economics in Empowering Afghan Communities in Afghanistan’s Sustainable Economic Development
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims the important role of home economics education in empowering Afghan households and promoting sustainable economic development across Afghanistan. Drawing on a quantitative methodology and household-level data from over 500 respondents across urban and rural regions, the study investigates how access to home economics training, financial literacy, income levels, education, household size, and urban–rural dynamics affect the adoption of sustainable practices. The results of a binary logistic regression analysis demonstrate that access to home economics training is a highly significant predictor of sustainable behavior. Financial literacy and household income also show positive, though comparatively moderate, effects. Notably, urban households are more inclined toward sustainable practices than rural ones, highlighting a disparity in access to training and resources. The study also uncovers that smaller households (3–4 members) tend to adopt sustainability practices more frequently than larger ones. Conversely, education level showed mixed results, suggesting that while education is influential, sustainability outcomes depend more on the integration of relevant practical knowledge than formal education alone. The study emphasizes the need for targeted policy interventions, such as expanding home economics education, especially in rural and low-income areas, promoting financial literacy, and developing gender-sensitive and household-specific sustainability training. The findings advocate for positioning home economics as a strategic tool in Afghanistan’s development policy, enabling grassroots change and promoting long-term environmental and economic resilience. This work adds value to the broader discourse on sustainability in developing contexts by recommending unified and inclusive methods that align education with real-life challenges and community empowerment.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
- Dillard, J., Dujon, V., & King, M. C. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding the social dimension of sustainability. Routledge.
- Dislere, V. (2012). Methodology structure for training teachers of home economics and technologies. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP), 5, 201-208.
- Gage, N.L., & Berliner, D.C. (1998). Educational psychology. Houghton Mifflin. Kalniņa, D. (2007). Iepako, izpakounkotālāk (Be packed, unpacked and what's next).
- RaKa. Available at http://www.zalais.lv/lv/iedzivotajiem/ebiblioteka/izglitibas_materiali/macibu-
- lidzeklis-iepako-izpako-un-talak/ (in Latvian)
- Kļaviņš, M. (2012). Vides piesārņojums un tā iedarbība (Environmental pollution and its effects). Latvijas Universitāte.
- Kristapsone, S. (2008). Zinātniskā pētniecība studiju procesā (Scientific research in the study process). Turība.
- Lice, I. (2003). Historical development of the subject Home Economics at general education schools in Latvia. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP), Latvia University of Agriculture, 126-131.
- Lice, I. (2012). Change of direction of Home Economics subject. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP), 5, 247- 248.
- Mandolini, K. (2007). Conditions, processes, and aims of the teacher education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 5-13.
- McKeown, R. (2002). Education for Sustainable Development. Toolkit, Version 2. Available at http://www.esdtoolkit.org/esd_toolkit_v2.pdf
- Nacionālais vides politikas plāns 2004.-2008. (2004). (National Plan of Environmental Policy 2004.-2008). MK rīkojums Nr. 81. Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. Available at http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=84021 (in Latvian)
- Noteikumi par pamatizglītības standartu, pamatizglītības mācību priekšmetu standartiem un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem (2014). (Regulations on the state standard of basic education, standards of basic subject and curriculum of basic programmes). MK noteikumi Nr.
- Available at http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=268342 (in Latvian)
- Pelnēna, M., & Kļaviņš, M. (2009). The concept of evaluation of education for sustainable development. Environmental Education at Universities (Ed. Kļaviņš, Zaļoksnis). LU, 69-83.
- Petere, A. (2013). Developing pupils’ cultural competences during integrated studies in multicultural environment of primary school. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Rural Environment Education Personality (REEP), 6, 241-247.
- Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987). United Nations Documents. Available at http://www.undocuments.net/wced-ocf.htm
- Rompczyk, E. (2007). Gribam ilgtspējīgu attīstību (We want sustainable development). Aģentūra DUE. Available at http://www.varam.gov.lv/files/text/darb_jomas//book_gribamia.pdf (in Latvian)
- Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030 (2010). Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Available at http://www.varam.gov.lv/lat/pol/ppd/?doc=13857
- Vides aizsardzības likums (2013). (Law on Environmental Protection). Available at http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=147917 (in Latvian)
- Zaļoksnis, J. (2009). Environment education and education for sustainable development in policies and at universities. Environmental Education at Universities (Ed. Kļaviņš, Zaļoksnis). LU, 105-126.